Karl Raimund Popper: Problem Neopositivistik dan Teori Kritis Falsifikasi

This item is published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Huda, M. Syamsul (2007) Karl Raimund Popper: Problem Neopositivistik dan Teori Kritis Falsifikasi. ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2 (1). pp. 71-80. ISSN 1978-3183; 2356-2218

[img] Text
M. Syamsul Huda_Karl Raimund Popper.pdf

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Karl Popper once criticizes the positivistic paradigm by means of what he calls the theory of falsification. To him, the positivistic paradigm constitutes a failure simply because it cannot distinguish between science and prude science, that is, between empirical method and non-empirical method. In the scientific knowledge, empirical science, mathematics and logic must be differentiated, something that the positivistic paradigm has failed to do. This paradigm furthermore, did not have a clear picture what logic-based science is, empirical knowledge and psychology of knowledge. It also fails to properly understand knowledge that springs from tradition, emotion, authority and so forth. All positivistic paradigms such as that of Karl Max’s Historicism, Freud’s theory of Psycho Analysis, Adler’s theory of Individual Analysis and Newton’s theory of Gravitation fall into this trap of failure.

Statistic

Downloads from over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

Item Type: Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailNIM
Huda, M. Syamsulsamuda70@yahoo.com2029037201
Contributors:
ContributionNameEmailNIDN/NIP
UNSPECIFIED., .UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Subjects: Filsafat
Uncontrolled Keywords: Induction; deduction; falsification; prude science; empirical and non-empirical science
Divisions: Karya Ilmiah > Artikel Jurnal
Depositing User: Editor : Abdun Nashir------ Information------library.uinsby.ac.id
Date Deposited: 20 Feb 2020 06:43
Last Modified: 20 Feb 2020 06:43
URI: http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/id/eprint/39142

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item